?

Log in

No account? Create an account
You don't know me. [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
randomposting

[ website | The Realm of Randomia ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Predestination? Or an irresponsible bitch who should go to jail... You decide. [Jul. 30th, 2005|04:38 pm]
randomposting
[mood |crankycranky]
[music |The $100,000 Pyramid]

Maureen Faibish, the owner of two pit bulls that attacked and killed Faibish's 12-year-old son in June in San Francisco while he was home alone (after Faibish had ordered him to stay away from the dogs and shut him in a room), denied that she was in any way responsible for little Nicholas' death. "It (was) Nicky's time to go," she told the San Francisco Chronicle. "When you're born, you're destined to go, and this was his time." [CNN-AP, 6-12-05]
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-07-30 04:27 pm (UTC)
See, this was in fact the very first I heard about it. Thank you for giving more details.

-- And perosnally I don't think that there's ANYTHING wrong with making your pets part of the family.. but there had to be some sort of inkling that these were aggressive animals. Family pets just don't kill a twelve year old boy on a whim. That's twisted.

And that woman most definitely needs to be fed to some very hungry pitbulls.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
From: hymn
2005-07-30 05:12 pm (UTC)
thats sick. people like that make me sick. considering a pets feelings / well being is fine but to place them above a person-- your own daughter! no.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-07-30 05:23 pm (UTC)
Well, that's ridiculous. You never put the needs of your pets over your child. If so, then you shouldn't have children. You should only have pets.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-07-30 06:05 pm (UTC)
I assumed that wasn't the only ingredient in the recipe. :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)