?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Filming things. - You don't know me. — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
randomposting

[ website | The Realm of Randomia ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Filming things. [Oct. 11th, 2006|01:42 am]
randomposting
[mood |calmcalm]
[music |Entry Into The Great Hall and The Banquet]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o1kMKcSBi0A&search=agriculture

Continuing with the random theme of things... ;)

The BBC paid Tony and Wendy Duffield of London 12,000 pounds (US$18,000) to have sex for a TV documentary. Easy, except for when you consider where the cameras were: she had a $23,000 camera fitted inside her vagina, he had a camera strapped to his penis. The footage, intended to capture the act of lovemaking from an ...uh... inside point of view, required 63 sessions of strenuous effort by the couple over a period of three weeks. (Reuters -June 26 1994)
linkReply

Comments:
[User Picture]From: faerie_mistress
2006-10-11 06:43 am (UTC)
eeww much?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: booniecat
2006-10-11 07:25 am (UTC)
At least the youtube was not related to the random fact...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
From: skittish_derby
2006-10-11 06:58 am (UTC)
ahahhahhahahahaha..


that is awesome.

did it have a microphone? i wonder what the inside of a vagina sounds like during sex.

<3
me
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: booniecat
2006-10-11 07:23 am (UTC)
Ewwww! That would be...

Wait. I bet it sounds squelchy
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
[User Picture]From: booniecat
2006-10-11 07:23 am (UTC)
Oh
My
Gawd

That is the weirdest, strangest random fact ever.

I can't even imagine it.

No, wait...I just did. ::shudder:: I think it would take more than 18,000 for someone to put a camera....up there. 18,500, at least. No, kidding. Wow.

Now I am sickly captivated by wondering what the documentary would look like.

Gee, thanks! ;)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 02:57 am (UTC)
lol! If you find it, post a link for us. :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: hymn
2006-10-11 08:24 am (UTC)
you're so random, randomposting! you?! continuing with the theme of randomness?! who wouldve thunk it! :)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 02:59 am (UTC)
:P
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: embe11ished
2006-10-11 11:38 am (UTC)
I don't think they were paid nearly enough!
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 03:01 am (UTC)
Agreed!!

Porn stars make so much more then that.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: lilpenguingurl1
2006-10-11 01:00 pm (UTC)
hmmmmmmmmmmmm... interesting.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 03:02 am (UTC)
*nod*
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: poop_on_a_stick
2006-10-11 03:33 pm (UTC)
Wouldn't the cameras...hurt? That's like 'here, strap this to your stuff and we'll pretend it doesn't change anything!' owwwwww
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 03:03 am (UTC)
Yeah I would think it would not feel good.. Not good at all.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: xenaamazon
2006-10-11 04:17 pm (UTC)

Ewwwww!!!

That is so nasty :( :( I bet it hurt too.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 03:07 am (UTC)

Re: Ewwwww!!!

Yeah, it doesn't sound like it would feel good.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread) (Expand)
[User Picture]From: zibacco
2006-10-11 05:27 pm (UTC)
I've heard of penetration shots, but that seems a bit extreme.

Can you imagine if they conceived during that process. They'd be the only couple in history to have pre-baby pictures.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 03:11 am (UTC)
Oooh! Now that is a cool idea!
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomdan
2006-10-11 08:43 pm (UTC)
63 sessions in 3 weeks = 3 times a day on average.
$18,000/63 = $285.71 per lay

If someone offered me $9000 to have sex thrice daily for three weeks I'd be inclined to take it also.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 03:14 am (UTC)
But with cameras attached..? I gotta think that'd hurt.

Plain old sex though? Hell yeah.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: esme
2006-10-11 08:53 pm (UTC)
I'd so do that! Mmm. Sex. Frequent sex. /sigh/ ;P

Gah! I bet I saw that documentary. I'll have to do some research to see if it is possibly the one in today's random fact.
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 03:15 am (UTC)
OOH! If'n you find a link you want to post it for us? I'd love to see sex from a more intimate perspective. hehe
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: duckfast
2006-10-12 05:37 am (UTC)
uhhhhh, ok. gross?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2006-10-12 06:55 am (UTC)
lol. ;)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)