?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Whirling Dirvish! - You don't know me. — LiveJournal [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
randomposting

[ website | The Realm of Randomia ]
[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

Whirling Dirvish! [Oct. 18th, 2005|12:15 pm]
randomposting
[mood |gotta pee!]
[music |lightning]


Image hosted by Photobucket.com


linkReply

Comments:
From: kiwioverture
2005-10-18 06:00 pm (UTC)
Musing about harry potter and debating if that's the groom or not are hardly philosophical interpretations.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: barcodegurl
2005-10-18 06:01 pm (UTC)
fine, fine, you win
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-10-18 06:45 pm (UTC)
Oh,don't give up thaaaat easy.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: barcodegurl
2005-10-18 06:47 pm (UTC)
im in a very... er... subserviant mood. is that even the right word? haha
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-10-19 11:18 am (UTC)
Hehe. Someone wants to be tied up. ;)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-10-18 06:44 pm (UTC)
What would you consider a philosophical conversation about this photograph? Or isn't one possible, because it's art? *raises a brow*
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: kiwioverture
2005-10-18 06:54 pm (UTC)
discussing the meaning...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: kiwioverture
2005-10-18 06:58 pm (UTC)
Actually, it looks pretty much like pure formalism, there might not be any intended meaning.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-10-19 11:24 am (UTC)
Perhaps. Thanks for your contribution.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-10-19 11:23 am (UTC)
It has to have a meaning?
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
(Deleted comment)
From: kiwioverture
2005-10-19 08:55 pm (UTC)

Re: Okay. . .

So what if someone wants to call these discussions philosophical or not?
Yea, so what, especially if they want to call them not philosophical.

We all have our own philosophies about how to deal with people, how to eat food, how to look at art.
I'm not contesting that. I tend to champion relativistic approaches to life.

For the love of Christ, can you not just once just look at a picture, read a story, absorb a statistic, or laugh at a joke without acting like an android about everything with absolutely no sense of humor whatsoever? Without trying to say how someone's comment seems to you to be "hardly" worth being posted.
I said that they weren't philosophical. I made no judgments regarding their worth in this discussion. Additionally, the post I was responding to was negatively reacting to the posts of several others, asking their topics of discussion to cease.

If you don't agree with what someone has to say, don't post it at all. Just don't post.
Your post is disagreeing with what I had to say. Disagreement is what makes discussion interesting. If we all agreed there wouldn't be anything to discuss.

Because negativity, it spreads like a cancer. And CANCER KILLS!
I really must object to this. It's sensationalistic. It's overextending an analogy. It's also a classic case of the pot calling the kettle black. Your post is far more negative than anything I could conceive.
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-10-21 03:41 pm (UTC)

Re: Okay. . .

Okay children, let's all calm down here. :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
From: kiwioverture
2005-10-21 04:35 pm (UTC)

Re: Okay. . .

agreed
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: randomposting
2005-10-21 03:37 pm (UTC)

Re: Okay. . .

*Turns on the fan* Oooh. It's getting warm in here...
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)